Enel new conflicting national legislation made after ec law could not override ec law. A fundamental judgment of the court in respect of principles, the costa v enel judgment shows that the eec treaty has created its own legal system which has become an integral part of the legal systems of the member states, and that community law takes precedence over national law. Flaminio costa, an italian citizen, had owned shares of edisonvolta. The creation of todays european legal order is usually traced back to a set of. However, the ecj in the case of costa v enel stated that member states are bound to follow eu law. The doctrine of union preemption in the eu single market. Enel case 664 how the european court of justice established the primacy of european union law over the laws of its member states. The claimant, costa, was an italian citizen with shares in the italian electricity supply company edisonvolta, and he sought to oppose moves by the state to nationalise the electric industry. The direct effect and supremacy of european union eu law is now an established facet of european jurisprudence. It tries to delineate the significance of the concept in the context of the contemporary eu supranational environment, the extent to which this sovereignty has remained with the member states and the normative implications of this. Costa v enel is the first proper case where the ecj considered the issue of doctrine of supremacy, and held that unequivocally that eu law is, and will be, supreme over national law. Supremacy, direct effect, and dairy products in the early. Flaminio costa v enel, european court of justice, case 664.
This case from 1964 led to the establishment the primacy of the eu law over the laws of member states. Costa was an italian citizen who had owned shares in an electricity company, edisonvolta, and opposed the nationalisation of the electricity sector in italy. The revolutionary doctrines of european law and the legal. Simmenthal nial fennelly costa v enel and simmenthal. European union lawsources, principles and supremacy. Gdlanswered case book sample 201617 by law answered issuu. In 1962, the italian government nationalized a private electricity company, a stock corporation, today. However, many things act so as to make parliamentary supremacy delusive, since international treaty obligations mean that certain legislation would never be passed. Although there is a close link between direct effect and supremacy, the latter was not affirmed by the cjeu until case 664 flaminio costa v enel 1964 ecr 585, also the result of a preliminary ruling. Flaminio costa v enel ente nazionale energia elettrica c 664 summary. The document also includes supporting commentary from.
In costa v enel the court outlined the characteristics of the community now union which had resulted in the ms loss of sovereign rights. On march 31, 2016 by officialblogunio in summaries of judgments. This principle was developed by the european court of justice, and, as interpreted by that court, it means that. Enel, and dairy products decisions were not set out in the treaty of rome itself. This is not an example of the work produced by our essay writing service. The document also included supporting commentary from. Dutch 196401255 german 196407 italian 196401177 english 196400614.
Virtually everyone associates costa v enel with the establishment of the principle of supremacy of european law, yet the story of that lawsuit is still known but to a few. The european court of justice and the doctrine of supremacy. Flaminio costa was an italian citizen who owned some shares of the electricity company. Content about costa v enel from the publication the abc of european union law 2010, european union by klausdieter borchardt just a year later, the costa v enel case gave the court of justice an opportunity to set out its position in more detail.
Judgement for the case 664 costa v enel this case was concerned with the nationalisation of the italian electricity industry, whose bills costa refused to pay in protest he had a stake in the private energy firm since he said its creation breached eu law. Eu integration costa v enel case 6\64 it was not until the. The treaty of rome does not state that eu law is to take precedence over domestic law. Amedeo arena, from an unpaid electricity bill to the primacy of eu law. Oxford university press online resource centre essay question. Eu integration costa v enel case 6\64 it was not until. In italy, subsequent law was considered to be the prevailing law in the case that two laws contradict each other. The corollary of eu sovereignty is the supremacy of eu law. Flaminio costa v enel 1964 case 664 was a landmark decision of the european court of justice which established the primacy of european union law then community law over the laws of its member states facts. Just a year later, the costa v enel case gave the court of justice an opportunity to set out its position in more detail. National law that predatespostdates of the directive doesnt matter. Nov 29, 2017 flaminio costa v enel, european court of justice, case 664, 1964, preliminary ruling. Italy is a member of the eu, or the european economic community eec as was. A brief history of a legal revolution morten rasmussen iii.
The judgments of the european court of justice ecj in van gend en loos and costa v enel is widely accredited for laying the doctrinaire foundations for the primacy of eu law. In this chapter, it is submitted that the concept of eu autonomy in effect comes down to a disguised claim to sovereignty. The past and future of eu law european university institute. Eu law and a later piece of national legislation ecj. Flaminio costa v enel 1964 case 664 established the supremacy of european community laws over the national laws of member sta. Enel saga, the internal primacy of eu law would have emerged anyway. Eu law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Oxford university press online resource centre essay. The study of the european legal order has recently taken a historical turn.
Article 267 tfeu and the overwhelming of the cjeu the. Case 664, flaminio costa v enel and case 10677, amministrazione delle finanze dello stato v simmenthal spa 1. Revisiting costa v enel and simmenthal ii herwig ch. Case 664, flaminio costa v enel and case 10677, amministrazione delle finanze dello stato v simmenthal spa. This principle was developed by the european court of justice, and, as interpreted by that court, it means that any norms of european law always take. Comparative law methodology were both a bit too fat.
Flaminio costa v enel, european court of justice, case 664, 1964, preliminary ruling. Confirmed the supremacy of eu law over domestic law. As the european court of justices ecjs two most famous decisions, van gend en loos and costa v. The court emphasises that the member states limit their sovereign rights and in turn created a supreme body of law. The primacy of european union law sometimes referred to as supremacy is an eu law principle that when there is conflict between european law and the law of member states, european law prevails. Cited van gend and took it further said that there had been a transfer of power to union institutions. Judgment of the court of justice, costa v enel, case 664 15. The relationship between community law and national law the french government proposes that francogerman production of coal and steal as a whole be placed under a common high authority, within the framework of an organization open to the participation of the other countries of europe. Enel case 664 how the european court of justice established the primacy of european union law over the laws of its member states 2. There are two important observations regarding the relationship between community law and national law being made by the ecj. The transfer by the states from their domestic legal systems to the community legal system of rights and obligations arising under the treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights. An italian citizen claimed that he need not pay a higher price for electricity as a result of the nationalisation of the italian electricity sector, in violation of eec law. What drove flaminio costa to sue his electricity provider over a bill of as little as. Costa was an italian citizen who had owned shares in an electricity company, edisonvolta, and opposed the.
Though the principle of supremacy is not explicitly show more content the pos continues to develop in costa v enel whereby the ecj ruled that eu law had became an integral part of the mss legal system and was binding on them. Costa v enel and simmenthal ii are cases well known for their impact on defining the legal parameters which govern the legal system of the eu ec. Ec law and the sovereignty of the member states in direct. Costa v enel, case 664 it was not until the decision of costa v enel that the role of the court of justice in treaty interpretation was confirmed and the task begun of deciding whether particular national statues and regulations were compatible with the relevant treaty provisions. Costa v enel seeing that the member states respect those obligations which have been imposed upon them by the treaty and which bind them as states without creating individual rights, but this obligationon the part of the commissiondoes not give individuals the right to allege, in community law orunder article 177, either failure by the state. The first case was van gend en loos which established that ec law is supreme over existing dutch law. Could enel the nationalised electricity company be. The document also included supporting commentary from author noreen omeara.
These cases are true classics in the history of case law of the ecj and thus have been discussed to great detail in legal writing. Associate professor of european union law, department of law, university of naples federico ii, italy. Primacy of european law ingolf pernice conflicts and integration. Costa claimed he was not liable for a bill sent to him by enel because the company enel was created in violation of the treaty of romes features on an undistorted market. Flaminio costa v enel 1964 case 664 was a landmark decision of the european court of justice which established the primacy of european union law then community law over the laws of its member states. Theses other open access research outputs eui theses published as books. In italy, subsequent law was considered to be the prevailing law. Costa v enel 1964 the amount in question was so small, there was no right of appeal under italian lawecj confirmed that in this case the reference should be made under article 234 3 as the magistrate was a court against whose decision there was no judicial remedy. Broadly, the book deals with the concept of sovereignty in the european union eu, in relation to direct taxation. After all, the doctrines advanced by the court in its van gend en loos, costa v. Mar 31, 2016 summary of costaenel 664 on march 31, 2016 by officialblogunio in summaries of judgments by jose ricardo sousa, student of the masters degree in eu law of uminho. This observation was followed by case 1170 internationale handelsgesellschaft v evgf 9 which went farther than costa v enel by stating that even secondary eu law in that case a regulation was a higher form of law than the constitution of a member state. Bollinger 1974 3 wlr 202 internationale handelsgesellschaft mbh v einfuhr 1972 cmlr 255. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in flaminio costa v enel case 664, eu.
Internationalle handelgesellschaft ec law prevailed even over conflicting constitutional law. Presented as a challenge to the courts jurisdiction, the case encouraged it to formulate the supremacy principle. This was largely connected with the eu doctrine of supremacy which emerged in 1964 in a case called costa v. The authority of eu law chapter 5 european union law. In costa v enel the ecj emphatically established the doctrine of supremacy of european community law over national law. Enel, are commemorated on their fiftieth anniversaries, attention has also turned to another of the ecjs early decisions.
Costa v enel in europe content about costa v enel from the publication the abc of european union law 2010, european union by klausdieter borchardt. The document also includes supporting commentary from author noreen omeara. From an unpaid electricity bill to the primacy of eu law. Flaminio costa v enel, european court of justice, case 6.
Case 664 costa v enel 1964 case summary webstroke law. Section 2 considers the claims made in van gend en loos vgl and costa v enel that eu law is an autonomous legal order which limits. Sixty years after its launch by the european court of justice in the case of costa v enel, the notion that eu law derives from an autonomous source still leads to divergent interpretations. Conflicts and integration revisiting costa v enel and. This was the first statement of the principle of supremacy. Costa v enel 1964 euecj c664 defrenne v sabena 1976 ecr 455 francovich v italy ecj 1991 ecr i5357. The relationship between community law and national law. Established the supremacy of european community laws over the national laws of member states. Flaminio costa v enel 1964 case 664 was a landmark decision of the european court of justice which established the primacy of european union law then.
288 1135 1113 469 1440 449 235 1106 1245 1008 240 1190 381 167 1360 1016 1307 588 1070 671 1115 1239 1141 32 187 691 560 939 531 1309 1420 790 656 813 160 1043 763 1212 623 504 1380 1481 527 638 616 3 332